Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Sign Sign Everywhere A Sign

New fresh water in Arctic could shift Gulf Stream
Associated Press

AMSTERDAM (AP) — Scientists are monitoring a massive pool of fresh water in the Arctic Ocean that could spill into the Atlantic and potentially alter the key ocean currents that give Western Europe its moderate climate.

The oceanographers said Tuesday the unusual accumulation has been caused by Siberian and Canadian rivers dumping more water into the Arctic and from melting sea ice. Both are consequences of global warming.

If it flushes into the Atlantic, the infusion of fresh water could, in the worst case, change the ocean current that brings warmth from the tropics to European shores, said Laura De Steur of the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research.

German researcher Benjamin Rabe, of the Alfred Wegener Institute, said the Arctic's fresh water content had increased 20 percent since the 1990s — about 8,400 cubic kilometers. That is the equivalent of all the water in Lake Michigan and Lake Huron together or double the volume of water in Lake Victoria, Africa's largest lake.

Increased runoff from the great northern rivers "could potentially impact the large scale ocean circulation in the Atlantic Ocean. This is important for us in Western Europe because our climate is pretty much dictated by the Thermohaline ocean circulation," said De Steur.

The Thermohaline current loops like a conveyer belt from the tropics to the North Atlantic, driven by the differences in salt content and wind patterns. Warm water from the south gains in salinity and grows heavier as it cools. At its northern end, the current is further chilled by cold air and sinks, warming again and rising as it travels south.

That cycle could be affected when the pool of fresh water is released into the Atlantic, said De Steur and Rabe. The icy water has been kept bottled up in the Arctic by wind patterns, which have not shifted their general clockwise direction for the unusually long time of 12 years. Normally, the winds change at intervals of five to 10 years.

The two scientists spoke to The Associated Press as part of a European Union initiative, called Clamer, to collate and publicize information from 300 EU-funded research projects conducted over the last 13 years on climate change and marine ecology. Rabe and colleagues from the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremerhaven, Germany, published their research last year in the journal Deep Sea Research on the effects of higher river runoff on ocean salinity.

De Steur said most of the excess fresh water has collected in the Canada Basin, but in the last three years changes also have been noticed in the Eurasian side of the Arctic Ocean.

"It's important to monitor this to see if this can be transported to the Atlantic, where it might potentially effect the Gulf Stream and the Thermohaline circulation," she said.


  1. Illumination Guy,
    Europe and some other awakening nations and sectors of the world may have to pass some laws in order to get the US on board to slow the slide into climate change and resulting reduced food output in the world. I have read some low level types in those nations have brought up this as a solution.
    The US has used trade embargo as a tool or weapon against many countries over the years, Cuba, North Korea to name two. In the most extreme cases it prohibited individuals or corporations from doing business with them, and in some cases prohibits their subsidiaries from trade as well.
    As the data mounts against our institutionalized and corporate denial of cause and effect I assume one day we may see the EU propose not a ban but perhaps a trade tariff based on some metric of pollution or waste. Faced with such a burden, maybe, just maybe the congress will change bed partners, and stop screwing around with the fossil fuel guys.
    When will the first casino with a beach open on the arctic ocean?

  2. The deniers of the truth will still be denying up to the time that it is possibly too late to correct course.

  3. fringe -

    I like the idea of the world getting together and putting pressure on the biggest polluters. (China and the US) I am just not sure they have the economical fortitude to do so though.

    A carbon cap, not carbon tax, is the best path to climate security. It guarantees reductions in global warming pollution at the lowest possible cost. A tax on carbon emissions might make pollution cost more, but can't guarantee that emissions will go down as much as scientists tell us is necessary to ward off a full blown climate crises. A carbon cap will spur innovation and investment in new technologies.

  4. I remember watching something a year or two ago that talked about this same thing - interrupting the flow and affecting Europe. Looks like it may come true to some extent.